Thursday, June 20, 2019

Studies on Rhetoric Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Studies on Rhetoric - Essay ExampleWithout knowledge, rhetoric was nothing more than tricking people with emotion.Rhetoric and knowledge unite is the most powerful path of convincing your enemies of your superiority. Aristotle believed good speaking involved two types of evidences. Inartistic proofs were things like facts, statistics and testimonies. Artistic proofs included trine categories known as pathos, logos and ethos. Pathos is a proof that appeals to the emotions. Logos is a proof that concerns the use of logic. Ethos is a personal proof. Aristotle believed that every speech had to have all three of these artistic proofs and that they must balance each other.Epideictic discourse is older, according to Jeffrey Walker, than political or legal discourse. This oldest form of rhetoric is used to place blame or to honor a person. The most important thing to be remembered according to Aristotle is that when using this form of rhetoric the speaker musk keep the opinions of the aud ience in fountainhead as they currently exist towards the subject of praise or criticism.Ciceros five canons of rhetoric are invention, arrangement, style, memory and delivery. Invention deals with finding a way to persuade the audience through use of past experiences and ingenuity. Arrangement is organizing the argument so it is effective and coherent. Style involves using emotion to be convincing. Memory way of life speaking without notes or prior preparation and delivery deals with effective use of facial expressions, voice and gestures while speaking.Quintilian believed that the five parts of a speech were the exordium, the narratio, the division, the proof and the peroration. In the exordium, the speaker tries to make an emotional connection with the audience. In the narration the speaker explains the basics of the case through the use of facts. The division is where the speaker lists the points he aims to prove or how he will prove the opponent wrong. The proof is

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.